PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATO vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ATO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
33.58%
12.92%
ATO
^GSPC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 32.31% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 24.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 13.55%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.16% annualized return.


ATO

YTD

32.31%

1M

5.88%

6M

33.58%

1Y

36.62%

5Y (annualized)

9.60%

10Y (annualized)

13.55%

^GSPC

YTD

24.72%

1M

1.67%

6M

12.93%

1Y

30.55%

5Y (annualized)

13.88%

10Y (annualized)

11.16%

Key characteristics


ATO^GSPC
Sharpe Ratio2.612.54
Sortino Ratio3.743.40
Omega Ratio1.461.47
Calmar Ratio3.983.66
Martin Ratio14.7616.26
Ulcer Index2.60%1.91%
Daily Std Dev14.73%12.23%
Max Drawdown-51.94%-56.78%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.88%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ATO and ^GSPC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATO, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.612.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATO, currently valued at 3.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.743.40
The chart of Omega ratio for ATO, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.461.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATO, currently valued at 3.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.983.66
The chart of Martin ratio for ATO, currently valued at 14.76, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.7616.26
ATO
^GSPC

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.61
2.54
ATO
^GSPC

Drawdowns

ATO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.88%
ATO
^GSPC

Volatility

ATO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.96%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.70%
3.96%
ATO
^GSPC